Ok
let me tell you a little more about Harry Crawford aka Eugenia
Falleni, at the committal hearing in August 1920, witnesses included
the dentist who made the false teeth found with Annie young Harry's
mum and his aunt also identified the gemstone found with the body as
being Annie's.
Young
Harry also gave evidence about how his mother only married
Crawford/Falleni because he was so persistent and that there had
always been fights between them and it was never a happy marriage.
He told how his mum was worried about Crawford and how they left him
but he found them and smashed up everything.
He
told how when Crawford took him to the Gap and tried to get the boy
to follow him through the fence to the cliff edge but as young Harry
felt that his step-father didn't like him and his manner was more
unpleasant then normal he didn't trust the man so stayed back, of
course his lawyer objected to the evidence but the magistrate allowed
it on the ground that it indicated Crawford's state of mind.
The
Government Medical Officer (Dr Palmer) repeated his testimony from
the post-mortem that he believed Annie died of burns and was alive
when the fire began, due to blistering on the skin he could not say
if she was conscious or not, although he did state the small cracks
on the skull were likely a result of the fire but a more substantial
one could have been the result of violence against her person.
Henrietta
Schieblich, who rented a room to Harry after Annie's death, said he
told her his wife had left him and added “We had a jolly good row,
and I gave her a crack on the head, and she cleared off”. She also
claimed Harry had said he was going to kill Annie's son on the night
he took him to dig holes in the scrub.
Another
witness supported young Harry's evidence that Harry, who couldn't
read or write and had asked others to look for mentions of a murder
in the newspapers in the weeks after Annie's disappearance.
The
prosecutor was given permission to treat Harry/Eugenia's daughter
Josephine as a hostile witness and submitted her earlier sworn
statement to police as evidence:
"I first remember my mother when about seven years of age. She always wore men's clothing, and was known as Harry Crawford. I was brought up at Double Bay by Mrs. de Angeles, whom I used to call 'Granny.' Granny told me that Harry Crawford was my mother, and that my father was the captain of a boat. My mother was very cruel to me when I was a child, and often forgot me. Granny told me that my mother tried to smother me when I was a baby. Mrs. de Angeles died when I was about 12 years of age, and my mother took me to a little confectionery shop in Balmain, kept by a Mrs. Birkett, who had a son named Harry. My mother told me Mrs. Birkett had some money, and always thought my mother was a man. I said to my mother, 'She'll find you out one of these days.' My mother replied, 'Oh, I'll watch it. I would rather do away with myself than let the police find anything about me.' My mother told me always to call her father, and not let Mrs. Birkett nor anyone else know that she was a woman. I did not know that my mother was married to Mrs. Birkett, but they occupied the same bed-room. They quarrelled a great deal, and mother used to come out and say, 'More rows over you. I cannot get any sleep.' I replied to my mother, and she said, 'Oh, a lovely daughter I've got.' I said, 'What can you expect? A lovely mother I've got.' In 1917 I met my mother, who told me everything was unsettled and upside down, as Mrs. Birkett had discovered she was a woman. My mother seemed very agitated, and was always reticent about herself."
At
the end of the hearing Crawford/Falleni was committed for trial and
refused bail. A few days after the committal hearing, the magistrate,
Mr. Gale, was criticised in a Sydney newspaper for personally
escorting into the courtroom, and providing 'box seats' for, a
popular actor and actress.
The
trial of course caused a press sensation with the accused appearing
in the dock first in a man's suit then in women's clothes
The
Crown case followed the evidence presented at the committal, although
the Prosecutor was reticent when 'referring to the relations between
the accused and the deceased because “there were some matters to
which he did not care to refer to in the presence of women”.He was
rebuked by the presiding Chief Justice, Sir William Cullen, who
responded that if women came to a Criminal Court they must be
prepared to hear such things otherwise they would stay away. The
Prosecutor then concluded with information that he said demonstrated
the accused 'was so practical in deceit' as to be able to convince
two women 'for years' that he was biologically male.
Only
described as 'an article' at the time, later newspaper accounts
report the Police search of the home Falleni shared with Lizzie in
Stanmore, and the discovery of a dildo in a bag belonging to Falleni
the exchange between Falleni and the Police detective was repeated in
Court:
"[Falleni] said: 'You will find it, something there that I have been using.'
Detective: 'What is it, something artificial?'
[Falleni] replied: 'Yes, don't let her see it.'
Detective: 'Do you mean to say that she doesn't know anything about this?'
[Falleni] said his first wife had not known about it either, 'Not until the latter part of our marriage.'
Evidence
from other witnesses did not always support the Crown's case. While
on his way to work, David Lowe saw a woman with a suitcase behaving
in a 'half-witted' way, who disappeared into the scrub 200 yards from
where the burned remains were found and Police-Inspector Mayes was
one of those, at the original inquest, who suggested the body may
have been of a woman who set herself on fire accidentally.
Naturally
Harry pleaded not guilty to the murder but the jury took only two
hours to reach their verdict and he was convicted and sentenced to
death, asked by the Chief Justice if he had anything to say he spoke
to his lawyer and replied “ I have been three months in Long Bay
Gaol, I am near to a nervous breakdown, I am not guilty, I know
nothing about this charge and it is only through false evidence that
I have been convicted. Naturally he appeal against the conviction on
the basis of
“...that the jury's verdict was against evidence, that the evidence tendered by the Crown was weak and merely circumstantial; that the case against the accused set up by the Crown was destroyed by the evidence of the Crown's medical witnesses; that the identification of the appellant with some person alleged by the Crown to have been seen in the neighbourhood of the place where a charred body was found was unsatisfactory, and that owing to nervous prostration at the trial, the appellant was physically unable to make a statement of facts, which would have answered the circumstantial evidence..."
The
Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed the case finding that if the
original jury 'came to the conclusion that the accused was the person
who had brought about the death of the woman, no matter by what
means, it was justified in finding a verdict of guilty'
Although
his sentence was commuted to imprisonment for life
but
his alleged immorality in passing as a biological male was made much
of in the popular press, which portrayed him as a monster and a
pervert.
Friends
of Harry and 'prison reform workers' petitioned 'on several
occasions' for his release and in February, 1931, reportedly
following an hour-long visit with the prisoner, the Minister for
Justice granted him freedom on the basis that he was nearly sixty
years old and 'not of robust health'.Upon leaving Long Bay Prison, he
was taken by car 'for an unknown destination'.
In
the Evening
News questions
were again raised about the case such as there being no certainty
that the body was Birkett's, the skull fractures and the effect of
the fire, the possibility of poison and the lack of 'definite
evidence that Falleni had taken the woman's life'.
In
April 1935, when Inspector Stuart Robson gave a speech upon taking on
the role of officer in charge of the Broken Hill Police District, he
recalled his involvement with the Falleni case:
"I was also responsible for the arrest of Eugenia Falleni, the famous man-woman. She was the child of an Italian skipper and he dressed her in male clothes and she worked as a cabin boy. She kept to male attire, and her exploits are well known. She was convicted for the murder of her 'wife,' and was sentenced to life imprisonment. I arrested her when she was working as a man, breaking down rum in a Sydney hotel cellar. That was three years after the murder. I thought I had arrested a man, and it was not until she declined to undress that I thought there was something wrong. A doctor made the discovery. She was subsequently released and has completely disappeared."
Crawford/Falleni
had assumed the name "Mrs. Jean Ford"
and
became the proprietor of a boarding house in Paddington, Sydney.
On
9th
June 1938 he stepped off the pavement in front of a motorcar in
nearby Oxford Street and was struck by it, and died of his injuries
the following day in Sydney. He was only identified through
fingerprint records and the £100 she gained from the sale of the
boarding house business, just before the accident, was found in his
bag.
The
inquest returned a verdict of accidental death. Crawford/Falleni's
funeral notice was announced under his final name and he was buried
in the Church of England section of Rookwood Cemetery.
Nice post☺ Happy Monday ♥
ReplyDeleteThank you
DeleteThat is such a bizarre story. Interesting but strange.
ReplyDeleteI agree strange indeed
DeleteI have a love/hate feeling about this story. It's so fascinating, yet so incredibly difficult to read the details.
ReplyDeleteI understand that made be wonder what the hell a few times
DeleteWow. There are some strange people who walk among us.
ReplyDelete